Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff’s Brief and remand order
arguing the Court should remand for an award of benefits
Past relevant work – 5-year rule
he or she must identify a “genuine” inconsistency
to take any further action needed to complete the administrative record
[Tuylia R.] v. O’Malley (D.N.J. July 22, 2024) - morbid obesity, medical opinions, subjective complaints, sentence 6 remands due to new evidence Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff’s Brief[Tuylia R.] v. OMalley, No. 2: 22 CV 2322, 2024 WL 3493796 (D. N. J. July 22, 2024) (Decision by U. S. Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King, by consent) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief, Plaintiffs Reply Brief and court decision Topics addressed: Medical opinions supportability Medical opinions consistency Medical opinions articulation requirements Subjective symptoms regulatory factors Subjective symptoms required findings Obesity Harmless error