3) The ALJ’s residual functional capacity (“RFC”) assessment is not supported by substantial evidence
1) The ALJ failed to comply with this Court’s remand order in evaluating the opinion of Dr
A helpful tool to recover all fees you seek
RFC - need for special supervision
2) The age categories were erroneously applied mechanically in a borderline situation
[Kathryn L.] v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (6th Cir. Feb. 2, 2024) - evaluation of pseudo seizures (psychogenic nonepileptic seizures), subjective complaints 3) The ALJ’s residual functional[Kathryn L.] v. Commr of Soc. Sec., No. 23 1460, 2024 WL 400329 (6th Cir. Feb. 2, 2024) (Decision by Gibbons, White, and Thapar, Circuit Judges) Briefs Included: Appellants Initial Brief and Appellants Reply Brief Topics addressed: Listing medical equivalence RFC off task findings Testimony of lay witness Subjective symptoms lay evidence Subjective symptoms improper focus on objective evidence Subjective symptoms required findings Specific impairment