Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $18.75 Learn more
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 8 - Aug 13
RFC - reliance on outdated assessments of the State agency medical consultants
4) The ALJ’s finding that Plaintiff can return to his past relevant work as a security officer and security guard are not supported by substantial evidence
1) Whether remand is required as the ALJ failed to translate all documents in the record from Spanish to English
3) Whether the ALJ’s RFC assessment is supported by substantial evidence
to be "unpersuasive" are not supported by substantial evidence
Shalonda C. v. Kijakazi (C.D. Ca. Apr. 11, 2024) - migraine headaches, RFC, subjective complaints, VE/DOT conflict, sentence 6 remands RFC - reliance on outdatedShalonda C. v. Kijakazi, Case No. 2: 22 cv 08634 SPG BFM (C. D. Ca. Apr. 11, 2024) (Order by District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett) Briefs for purchase: Joint Stipulation (Plaintiffs portion only) and remand order Topics addressed: RFC relationship with PRTF findings Medical opinions supportability Medical opinions consistency Medical opinions must consider supportive notes Subjective complaints improper focus on overall credibility Vocational
US$ 2779.50
US$ 2429.50
US$ 1349.50
US$ 1174.50
US$ 484.50
US$ 3479.50
US$ 5099.50
US$ 1899.50
